2/18/2008

Amero taking down middle class

I'm asking The Bee to address the issue of the "Amero" and its part in the rapid devaluation of the U.S. dollar and in delaying response to securing the border. The "Amero" would be developed through the creation of the North American Union, which currently goes under the name
"The Security and Prosperity Partnership" consisting of Canada, Mexico and the United States. This idea was supposedly launched in March 2005.
The Mexican and Canadian economies rely, primarily, on the United States for trade and economic stability. They are, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, our top suppliers of oil. How will union with two nations, one morally bankrupt and each possessing poorly performing currencies, advance the United States? It probably won't.
Observers predict that this "union," or "partnership," will not only dissolve U.S. sovereignty but destroy our domestic shipping industries, redistribute our middle-class wealth and eliminate what we now consider border security. Will America be the next European Union?
MARTHA G. ACEVEDO
Oakdale

Editor's note: No government agency or official has recommended forming a North American Union, a common currency or giving up any sovereignty to any other government or agency.

Fix the funny money system!

Many have now heard rumblings of the “amero”, a proposed North American currency to replace the Canadian loonie, dollar and peso. However, most of the mentions of this concept, when discussed in the mainstream media tend to focus on suggesting that talk of an “amero”, and in effect, the accompanying North American Union, is nothing but a conspiracy theory created by deluded xenophobes afraid of immigration and globalization. The Boston Globe recently wrote such a story, titled, “The Amero Conspiracy”, which stated, “The SPP [Security and Prosperity Partnership] does exist, and its tri-national task forces continue to meet, but its members consider it a way for the United States, Canada, and Mexico to collaborate on issues such as customs, environmental and safety regulations, narcotics smuggling, and terrorism. The amero, on the other hand, appears to be purely theoretical.” However, despite being conveyed as “purely theoretical”, a recent article in the national Canadian newspaper, the Financial Post, referred to the amero, not as a theoretical idea or conspiracy theory, but as a potential reality. The article entitled, Fix the Loonie says out the process to be undertaken before the adoption of a continental currency known as the Amero. [...] So clearly, there is a move on toward a regional currency for North America, in conjunction with the formation of a North American Union. Monetary sovereignty, and especially the power to create and issue money, is perhaps more central to the idea of a free, democratic and sovereign nation than the right to vote. If we do not have the power over the issuance of money, it does not matter whom we vote for. It’s the Golden Rule: he who has the gold, makes the rules. We, as Canadians, and other peoples of their respective nations should never relinquish this sovereignty over to regional boards, private banks, or other unaccountable individuals. It is our right, not a privilege, and giving up such a right is akin to giving up the right to vote; it is anathema to democracy and a free society.

Source: GlobalResearch.ca

No Amero Endgame

Posted On: Monday, February 18, 2008
Questions And Answers
Author: Jim Sinclair

Question:
With regard to the connecting of the gold market dots article, is the UDSX .5200 the ratio of the dollar to the euro?

Answer:
No, .5200 is a price objective referring to the US Dollar Index.


Question:
Would you comment on the possibility of a new North American currency that may someday become a reality and what it would do to the gold market as well as the US Dollar?

Answer:
That will not happen. Hypothetically if a new North American currency was created the dollar would no longer exist and gold in terms of the dollar would have risen to infinity.


Source: JSmineset.com

2/16/2008

"I would love to see the process [of World Government] adapted to the local situation."

Vicente Fox Seeks Interdependent North America and Emerging World Government
Former Mexican President Urges U.S. to Embrace "Solidarity" Not "Selfishness" as North American Union Unfolds

Read the whole article

2/14/2008

Missed the North American Union?

Man, here we are covering family leave funding and home inspector licensing, when the big story is the elite group of bankers and intellectuals who plan to merge Mexico, Canada and the United States into one super-nation, replace the dollar with the amero, fit us all with tracking chips, and – take over the world?(!) So maybe we don’t keep up with all the latest and greatest conspiracies. But how did we miss the North American Union?

Source: The Olympian

Bail out, baby, one more time!

Now, all of a sudden, due to skyrocketing gold prices caused by all the failed solutions to all the above-mentioned problems, and due to virtually nonexistent and/or unavailable central bank gold hoards, we are about to witness the purported sale of the IMF gold - AGAIN! Yes, the perpetual "IMF Gold Sales" are on once again, and nothing could be more bullish for gold! Talk about treating only the symptoms and not the underlying diseases!!! The last time the IMF did this was its 1978-1980 auctions of about 800 metric tonnes of gold, which coincided with the very sharpest part of the run-up in the greatest bull market for gold up to that point in time. We are torn between telling Congress (as gold bugs) to go for it and telling the Congress (as citizens) that if the IMF can't operate at a profit or at least break even, they do not deserve to be bailed out by use of our or any other country's gold reserves. NO MORE BAILOUTS!!! [...] The G-7's preliminary approval of this sale of 400 metric tonnes of gold, if implemented by US Congressional approval as required by law, will be just as ineffective as all the other moves of desperation enumerated above and will completely fail in its intended purpose - gold suppression. And make no mistake about it, that is what this move is all about. Note how the agreement is supposed to be finalized in April. Gee, isn't that the month where the most active gold futures are now placed, some 300,000+ of them, to form the latest mountain of shorts for the cartel? Hmm, isn't the peak of the gold season usually in the April to May time frame?

Read Bob Chapman's IF

2/12/2008

Mrs. President sez:

[Bilderberger-Darling] Sen. Hillary Clinton addressed a town hall meeting there and was taking questions from the audience. One elderly woman rose and was asking the Democratic candidate about a rumored economic union among the United States, Canada and Mexico that is widely discussed, feared and abhorred among conspiracy fanciers. The woman said the president planned to implement the secret agreement in 2010. Then the woman called the president "Bush the bastard." The Democratic crowd immediately roared its approval. Sen. Clinton nodded her head slightly and smiled. Then, she proceeded to answer the question, [crying] saying "there's not a lot of truth to it."

Source: LATimes Blog

2/03/2008

We the serfs

To Prime Minister Stephen Harper, cc. Stéphane Dion, Jack Layton, Gilles Duceppe.
We, the people of Canada, demand that you fully disclose the details of the Security and Prosperity Partnership Agreement and all other secret agreements and ratifications relative to any proposed integration of trade, security and armed forces with the United States and immediately place a moratorium on any further development of such plans and abrogate any agreements made to date pending a decision by a nationwide Referendum on these issues.

The Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America was initiated on March 31, 2005 by the leaders of Canada, the United States and Mexico to combine free trade as a hostage to security cooperation but cannot be allowed to go forward unless ratified by all the citizens of Canada in a free vote..
In particular, we demand that our national security policies be defined by Canadians on behalf of and for the benefit of Canadians. Our security would be better served if we disassociate ourselves from the U.S. "war on terror".

WE ARE A SEPARATE, INDEPENDENT NATION AND IT IS THE PEOPLE WHO MUST DECIDE THEIR FUTURE!

There's change forming! You brain-storming?

Custom Search